Manchester derby underlines United’s biggest failing in face of City excellence

Manchester City have been criticised for their spending but, in recent years, they’ve spent less and done it better than Manchester United.

Manchester United are the outsiders in Sunday’s derby, according to the bookies, as their stop-start form contrasts with a Manchester City side that have won 15 of their last 17 Premier League games. But United have managed to avoid the embarrassment of being the most expensive squad of the two old rivals on the day – by shifting over £100million-worth of players out on loan in January.
The recent transfer window saw the Blues, who for some years have had the most expensive squad in the league, become the second-most expensive as they sold Ferran Torres to Barcelona. That reduced the cost of their playing roster to around £800million and meant they were slightly below United, whose own squad was pieced together at a cost of £801million.
Going into the derby, City will actually have a more costly set of players from which to choose, despite having £7million Zack Steffen injured and £60million Ruben Dias a doubt, as United will be without £40million man Nemanja Matic. But that disparity only exists because United have trimmed their flabby squad by offloading Donny van de Beek (£35m), Amad (£19m) and Anthony Martial (£54m) on temporary transfers during the last window.

City have no senior players out on loan and every outfield member of the squad has made at least 16 appearances this season, which shows there is no excess at all – they cost plenty of money, but every player is heavily utilised.

And the fact remains that United have spent more on their current squad, including loanees, than have City. The contrast gets even more stark for Ralf Rangnick’s side when you compare the value of the two squads.

MANCHESTER, ENGLAND - MAY 23: Joao Cancelo, Ruben Dias and Bernardo Silva of Manchester City pose with the Premier League trophy after the Premier League match between Manchester City and Everton at Etihad Stadium on May 23, 2021 in Manchester, England. A limited number of fans will be allowed into Premier League stadiums as Coronavirus restrictions begin to ease in the UK following the COVID-19 pandemic. (Photo by Chloe Knott - Danehouse/Getty Images)
City players celebrate their league triumph

The football academics at the CIES Football Observatory have calculated that, even though City’s squad cost £800million, it is currently worth nearly £1billion on the market. In other words, the investments made by City’s owners in terms of players have already increased by nearly 25 per cent – good business in anyone’s books.

The only players who have depreciated in value for the Blues are Kyle Walker, Fernandinho and Kevin De Bruyne – all because they have turned 30. By stark contrast, of the 20 players in United’s squad who were brought in from outside, a remarkable 12 are no longer worth as much as United paid for them.

That is understandable in terms of ageing players like Juan Mata and Matic, but it is also true for players who should be prime assets like Paul Pogba, Harry Maguire and Fred – due to Pogba running down his contract, and the fact Fred and Maguire have not lived up to the fee paid for them. So Sunday will see the clash of the two most expensive squads in football, but one of those squads has appreciated in value and the other has depreciated.

And the fact that this malfunctioning United squad actually cost more than City’s league leaders, kicks away the final crutch on which United fans were leaning – that the Blues have only outstripped them on the pitch because of unfettered spending off it. Of course, none of that will matter in a Manchester derby, when the underdog has more than a fighting chance from the off, according to history.

Credit: Source link