NBA commissioner Adam Silver: NYC COVID-19 vaccination rule keeping Kyrie Irving from playing at home ‘doesn’t quite make sense’

NBA commissioner Adam Silver said the New York City vaccination mandate that is preventing Nets guard Kyrie Irving from playing in home games “doesn’t quite make sense to me,” speaking during an appearance on ESPN’s Get Up on Wednesday morning.

As a player unvaccinated against COVID-19, Irving may not play at the Barclays Center because of the mandate. However, a player from a different market who is unvaccinated may play in New York City.

“This law in New York, the oddity of it to me is that it only applies to home players,” Silver said. “I think if ultimately that rule is about protecting people who are in the arena, it just doesn’t quite make sense to me that an away player who is unvaccinated can play in Barclays but the home player can’t. To me, that’s a reason they should take a look at that ordinance.”

Silver said that the league wanted to make vaccinations a requirement for players but that the National Basketball Players Association pushed back. Still, he mentioned having 97% to 98% of players vaccinated and a “vast majority” boosted.

With the NBA offices in New York City, Silver has seen firsthand some of the masking restrictions being lifted, and he mentioned that there’s a “feel” in the city and that more people are out and about.

“So while, again, my personal view is people should get vaccinated and boosted, I can imagine a scenario where Brooklyn, as part of New York City, with a new mayor now who wasn’t in place, Eric Adams, when that original ordinance was put into place, I could see him deciding to change along the way and say it’s no longer necessary to have a mandatory vaccination requirement, as I said, particularly one that only affects home players,” Silver said.

This past Saturday, while talking to reporters in Miami, Irving expressed hope that the mandate would get overturned allowing him to play in home games.

“There’s no guilt that I feel,” Irving said. “I’m the only player that has to deal with this in New York City because I play there. If I was anywhere else in another city, then it probably wouldn’t be the same circumstances. But because I’m there, we have Eric Adams, we have the New York mandate, we have things going on that are real-life circumstances that are not just affecting me, bro. So you ask me these questions, I don’t feel guilt.

“I’m just living my life as best I can, just like everybody else that missed these last two years. I didn’t have a plan in place while all this was going on, didn’t know. The NBA and the NBPA made it very clear that there would be things that I would be able to do to work around this. And that’s off the table. So you tell me if I’m just alone out here or do I have support from everybody else that’s dealing with the same thing?”

Irving’s comments came two days after the blockbuster trade that sent James Harden from the Nets to Philadelphia and brought Ben Simmons to Brooklyn in a trade that played out publicly in terms of trade demands.

Silver said he hopes situations like this don’t play out in public that way but recognized that situations like this will occur.

“Ideally, when players want to get traded or teams are preparing to make moves, those are conversations they have confidentially with players, they have confidentially with other teams,” Silver said. “Obviously, in this case, it not only played out publicly but it’s been playing out since the season even began, particularly with Philly.”

When asked about what the data showed on the impact superstar movement has had on NBA fans, Silver said viewpoints have changed over the years.

“I remember David Stern’s sort of standard mantra was he would say Larry and you’d say Boston, you’d say Magic, you’d say Michael and you’d say Bulls, but that was a different time,” Silver said. “Now, what we’re seeing in the league, first of all, shorter contracts, which I don’t think is a bad idea because one of the things we tried to do working with our players’ association back beginning around 10 years ago was tie performance to pay in a closer way, and I think that’s what you see with shorter contracts.”

And while shorter contracts were something the league was good with, there is one thing Silver doesn’t want to see.

“So, the data shows that superstars moving isn’t necessarily a bad thing because it allows bad situations to, in an orderly way, to change,” Silver said. “It gives teams that may not be in a competitive position hope that they can sign one of those players, but shorter contracts to me is something very different, and free agents moving at the end of contracts is different, than what we just saw where you have players actively seeking to move while they’re under contract. The data is clear on that. That’s not good for the league.”

Credit: Source link